Sample Resume Beach Cleanup - 1243 Words

David Arellano Arellano, 1 Expository Composition Ms. Hayes 1 October 2015 Beach Cleanup In the country California alone is home to seven of ten of the United States’ highly polluted beaches. This is disappointing seeing as beaches are more than just a part of the vast ocean. They’re beneficial for the state’s tourism, part of our summer vacation memories and give us a glimpse into the healthy marine ecosystems. However, how can we keep these assumptions alive when tourism decreases, our loved ones are affected by harmful pathogens found on our shores and the marine life is affected due to our inability to maintain a clean beach? These images of our beaches are slowly dying out due to the growing problem of beach pollution. Beach pollution is mainly caused by plastic debris and other types of waste being poured carelessly onto our beaches. The various communities of California should dedicate time to address the growing problem of polluted beaches. By having the various communities of California participate in beach clean ups we can pre vent what Ocean Conservancy’s website, a nonprofit organization, calls â€Å"an avalanche of plastic debris† that is expected to â€Å"enter the ocean in the coming decade†. The organization reported having collected 16,186,759 pounds of trash in their 2015 report and 144,606,491 pounds since its founding in 1972. This does not even include tiny pieces of trash. This is collected only from the International Coastal Cleanup, but it’s almostShow MoreRelatedFundamentals of Hrm263904 Words   |  1056 PagesCandidate 169 Selection for Self-Managed Teams Reliability 171 Validity 171 Content Validity 171 Construct Validity 172 Criterion-Related Validity 172 Recruiting: A Global Perspective 146 DID YOU KNOW?: Posting Online Rà ©sumà ©s 147 Your Own Job Search 147 Preparing Your Rà ©sumà © 148 Some Final Remarks 149 Summary 149 Demonstrating Comprehension: Questions for Review 150 Key Terms 150 151 HRM Workshop 170 Key Elements for Successful Predictors 170 Linking Concepts to Practice: Discussion QuestionsRead MoreMarketing Mistakes and Successes175322 Words   |  702 Pagesgenius is going to be difficult to take out of the company.† By mid-2002, Silicon Valley was in its second full year of recession, and tens of thousands of young technology workers were unemployed, and the only firm hiring was Google. Thousands of rà ©sumà ©s poured in each week, and most were tossed away without any acknowledgment, and the bad mouthing began. More than 100,000 advertisers were using its services by 2003, yet its customer service was abysmal. Google preferred to automate customer interactionsRead MoreProject Mgmt296381 Words   |  1186 Pagesgreatly enhance your competitive edge as a project manager. The field of project management is growing in importance and at an exponential rate. It is nearly impossible to imagine a future management career that does not include management of projects. Rà ©sumà ©s of managers will soon be primarily a description of the individual’s participation in and contributions to projects. Good luck on your journey through the text and on your future projects. xi Brief Contents Preface vii 2 1. Modern Project

Dude, YouRe a Fag Essay - 1152 Words

Dude, you’re a Fag High school, the best years of your life with everyday shaping and molding you from a feminine boy to becoming a respectable masculine adult, in truth its surviving everyday without being called a fag. In C.J. Pascoe’s ethnography she examines the dynamics of masculinity carefully exploring gender conformity that’s extracted from a collection of humiliations, fears and anxieties among high school boys. Within the eighteen months that Pascoe tediously studied the students of River High, she opened my mind to reminisce about my high school years at El Capitan. From the pep rallies in the gym to the weight room discussions, however, Pascoe’s research expressed a deeper meaning to the formation of gender identities in†¦show more content†¦So in fact by rebelling against the schools moral stance about a cowboy it created a sense of greater masculinity for the boys at my school. It wasn’t until after reading this book that I realized how much the wo rd fag was tossed around in high school. In Pascoe’s analysis of the word fag she interviews many boys at River High and most of them had the same response, that a boy could be called fag for exhibiting any sort of behavior defined as unmasculine such as being stupid or incompetent, to caring too much about something, or being too emotional(57). With this I analyzed the situation I always got stuck in and constantly was under fire for the word fag. At River High having a girlfriend â€Å"both protected boys from the specter of the fag and bolstered their masculinity† in certain cases (90). At El Capitan I was the guy who always had a girlfriend but I never dated girls from the same school. Even though I was adored by other girls at the school for expressing my love interest to this other girl. The guys constantly threw the word fag at me for being emotionally attached to a girl. So I was intrigued and happy to hear that in Pascoe’s one on one interviews th e guys who would be calling me a fag were actually in the same situation as me but just too scared to admit their feelings publicly. All because of the social organization as Weeks explains that the peer influences within the high school put out aShow MoreRelatedDude YouRe a Fag1384 Words   |  6 PagesDUDE YOU’RE A FAG REVIEW BY John Denora High school, the best years of your life with everyday shaping and molding you from a feminine boy to becoming a respectable masculine adult, in truth its surviving everyday without being called a fag. In C.J. Pascoe’s ethnography she examines the dynamics of masculinity carefully exploring gender conformity that’s extracted from a collection of humiliations, fears and anxieties among high school boys. Within the eighteen months that Pascoe tediouslyRead MoreThe, You re A Fag : Masculinity And Sexuality1399 Words   |  6 PagesWhat is masculinity? Answers may vary depending on who you may ask, C.J. Pascoe’s ethnography titled Dude, You’re A Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School targets high school as being the important location where the term masculinity is asserted, defended and defined by the students who roam the halls of River High. High school is a difficult time for anyone, especially when we bring up the ideals of sexuality and gender identity, all topics which are explored in this ethnography. PascoeRead MoreHigh School : Gender And Gender Identity1681 Words   |  7 PagesDuring C.J. Pascoe’s eighteen months of observation in a racially assorted high school, â€Å"Dude, You re a Fag† shows new light on masculinity both as a field of meaning and as a set of social practices. C. J. Pascoe s unusual approach questions masculinity as not only a gender process but also a sexual one. She proves how the word fag becomes a disciplinary tool for regulating heterosexual and how the word fag is tied to the gender also but as it is to sexuality. Masculinity as a theory, some sociologistsRead MoreThe Social Construction Of Heterosexuality1250 Words   |  5 Pagesto question whether you are mentally stable, or if you may have a personality disorder? In C. J. Pascoe s’ essay â€Å"Dude, You’re a Fag: Adolescent Male Homophobia† he goes over how the use of the word faggot is just a way for men to hide their homophobia. â€Å"Homophobia is to facile a term with which to describe the deployment of a fag as an epithet. By calling the use of the word fag homophobia- and letting the argument stop there- previous research has obscured homophobia to describe a way boys aggressivelyRead MoreGender Roles : The New Man Of Disney / Pixar `` And Dude, You re A Fag1300 Words   |  6 PagesMany People are interested to know how we get our gender roles. The articles â€Å"Why Do We Make So Much Of Gender?†, â€Å"Post-Princess Models Of Gender: The New Man in Disney/Pixar† and â€Å"Dude, You’re a Fag: Adolescent Masculinity and the Fag Discourse† comply well with this topic. Gender roles have dramatically changed in the past few decades especially the roles of females as in the past they were thought to be the property of men. Stereotypes have played a big part on gender roles. The most common maleRead MoreAnalysis Of Michael Kimmels Men, Masculinity, And The Rape Culture1218 Words   |  5 Pages this view is typically not seen in today’s society. In C. J. Pascoe’s piece â€Å"Dude, You’re a Fag: Adolescent Male Homophobia,† Pascoe attempts to understand â€Å"fag discourse† in American high schools. After surveying different demographic groups within the school system, it was evident that although the term â€Å"fag† has ties to sexuality, it is mainly an epithet for gender. Specifically, Pascoe identifies â€Å"fear of ‘fag’ masculinity.† This variation of masculinity is present when a male-bodied personRead More`` Dude You re A Fag, Adolescent Masculinity And The Fag Discourse ``1123 Words   |  5 PagesIn the article â€Å"Dude you’re a fag; Adolescent masculinity and the fag discourse† C.J Pascoe addresses American adolescent boys learning to become masculine through the rejection of the fag identity. Masculinity and sexuality are embedded with the word faggot. This article focuses on the challenges of the relationships between homophobia and masculini ty. This article points out three arguments that focus on homophobia demonstrating that the fag is not only an identity linked to homosexual boys, butRead More`` Dude You re A Fag : Masculinity And Sexuality Essay1536 Words   |  7 PagesC.J. Pascoe’s book, Dude You’re A Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School, examines masculinity and its connection with sexuality through an eighteen-month study at River High School. The goal of Pascoe’s study is to explain how teenagers, teachers, and schooling construct adolescent masculinity through idioms of sexuality. In addition, the book investigates the relationships between gender and sexuality as it relates to a major social institution. Throughout the book she asks how heteronormitiveRead MoreGender Is An Act Of Social Deviance1187 Words   |  5 Pagesdiscuss what doing gender means along with other attributes of doing gender. These attributes includes what pushes us to do gender, why we do gender, the r esults of doing gender along with discussing what the boys in C.J. Pascoe’s article of Dude you’re a fag accomplished. This essay will discuss what doing gender is along with what causes us to do it and finally what doing it accomplishes. Explain what we do gender means: Each individual goes through the daily routine of doing gender. One may askRead MoreWomen’S Studies Is The Study Of Women. Women Have Their1281 Words   |  6 Pagesthey are not considered masculine men. In the chapter Dude You’re a Fag written by C.J. Pascoe, he goes to a high school where the term â€Å"fag† is being thrown around loosely among the male sex of the school. However, this is more dominantly seen in the cis-white men of the school and not their African American counterparts. With being a man in this atmosphere it became synonymous to also being a homophobe (Pascoe 55). In order to become the fag a male was to exhibit signs of being more feminine than

Is What You See Real or Memorex Free Essays

We have different philosophers and different ideas from each of the philosophers, similar in some ways, vastly different in others and yet their ideas make a person think, as they are supposed to but what if neither Rene Descartes, George Berkeley or Thomas Reid are correct in their entirety? What if both ways of thinking are actually linked together enough to make them both correct and both incorrect? Let us start with the definition of epistemology where the origins of nature and limits of human knowledge are examined. Human knowledge in the aspect of the real world is limited. There is no one on Earth who knows everything whether it be real or imagined. We will write a custom essay sample on Is What You See Real or Memorex? or any similar topic only for you Order Now (Rene Descartes belief of independent external world) This would become limited in any thought provoking conversation. If you were to ask people at random, if there is anything they know with certainty, they would say yes. They know for certain they are sitting or talking or looking at you or the tree. If you asked them if they were sure that they didn’t just perceive these instances they would chance to look at you like you were crazy but in the end there is also a perception. Take the example of the mind independent external world and ask yourself that if you died, would things in the world remain physically the same? The bed you slept in might until it was destroyed, the house in which you lived may remain a house but what about you as a person, you would not remain physically the same so in that view a mind independent world cannot be 100% accurate. One day you can see yourself in a mirror because you are alive, the next day you cannot because you are dead. On the other hand, you see things and believe them to be out in the world but what you see is only a perception which lends credence to Thomas Reid’s theory. Thomas Reid believes that we do not need certainty to acquire knowledge and I agree and as you will see by the following poem, the timing of perception may almost destroy Descartes and Berkley’s theories. See how that worked, I believe the following poem will destroy a theory and this is perception. NOW What has been and what will be, cannot be changed, cannot be seen. For yesterday is gone and done and tomorrow lies beyond the sun, yet there is reality, that fine line between futures and past that we define as now. The eyes have never seen, nor the ears ever heard, the falling of a star or the calling of a bird. They merely transmit shadows, vibrations they receive, along the neural networks, for the brain to be deceived into thinking that what we see and are believing and what we hear; but do we perceive reality or only what we think is there? Now a millisecond past, from eye or ear to mind and another billisecond just for the brain to define, so what we perceive as happening is at least a millisecond past. We cannot exist within the now, our reactions aren’t that fast. So is what we see a piece of history by the time we can perceive or do our senses touch the future, which do you believe? Either way it’s plain to me that there is no now to be found. We live two separate times so why are we so bound? Now that I’ve given you a thought to twist your mind, I must say excuse the pun, I’m simply out of time. (Original copyright 1999 Cara Tapken-(Teirsha=pen) ) In reading this poem, where is the certainty now as suddenly a lot of questions have been posed and suddenly a whole new thought process will evolve into the metaphysical sense of perception. Take another example of looking at a field or horizon of trees, or any group of trees for that manner, how do they look? Ok so they look like trees but in seeing the trees do you see them as you might if there is no 3 dimensional quality or do you see them with a much defined 3-D quality? Each one will see this differently at different times which lends further conveyance of truth to the supernatural beliefs and so with this in mind where does Descartes and Berkley fit into this picture? Let us use God as an example. God is definitely a perception. Many of us believe in him, many of us think he is almighty and the basis of religion but outside of pictures for one, do we really know what he looks like? This is a form of perception as we do not know with certainty what he looks like but we only know from pictures and words of description. What of prayer? How do we really know that prayer works even though we believe? Do we see our prayers physically being listened to by God? Do we see God there with an outstretched hand in receiving? Also, Descartes believed in God and God was the centrifuge of his Roman Catholic faith and theory so in believing in God, when God is a perception and written words then how can Descartes claim the theories he does because suddenly there is no certainty. The Roman catholic faith believes in archangels, evil and good yet without seeing these in a physical sense whatsoever how can one obtain certainty in knowledge or vice versa? With regard to perception and certainty, how can these philosophers be wrong and right at the same time by validating one another’s theories and if there is a validation of theories then do they suddenly have related theories to for a whole new theory? Descrates believes in no knowledge without certainty and Reid believes in perception. Take into account of the poem which is a perception based poem with much pointing towards the reality of how our human brain, through proven science, works. Suddenly there is the certainty in knowledge and how perception works and is very real. Both philosophers are now correct and both are now wrong. Did we just blow two theories away, add to them or validate all or part of the theories these two obviously share? Mind independent external world does exist to a degree but as well, only by the degree of perception until the â€Å"brain can define† (CL Tapken). Now Clifford is famous for his evidentialist thesis that â€Å"It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything on insufficient evidence. (W. K. Clifford). I simply would like to know where Clifford’s justification is for telling people that they way they think or how they think, simply because there is a lack of evidence, is wrong. I see him as suddenly wrong for being discriminatory in a sense as theory is based upon having no actual evidence for justification as science always dictates. The theory of using cancer cells to treat cancer is nothing but a theory, there is no evidence as it has not yet been tested to be proven but in thinking this way, according to Clifford, is wrong which is highly inconsistent with the continual forward progress of science. Now Berkley’s theory is much more rational in my opinion as he believes in both sides of what you can and cannot see. He believes in the mind and the thought processes that integrate a thought to reality and that one doesn’t need complete certainty for some knowledge and he calls this the law of nature. He has a belief process in the realm of science but he couples that with a religion to form his belief that all things happen because of God and spirits. Now for those who are quite religious, this would be believed but then there are those who are atheists and or believe in the Darwinism theory of evolution thus suddenly, in either case there is no God. But is Berkeley right, to at least some belief that God is the reason behind everything that happens? Perception and gravity denounces, in part, if not all of Berkley’s theory that God is behind everything. The Bible and those who believe in the religion of God agree that God made the heavens and the earth. We will assume that this is not perception but true. But what of gravity? No where in history is it said that God created gravity. Gravity makes the world spin thus creating the â€Å"accidental† gravity. God did not create gravity by design so now it should be safely said that gravity began as a perception that turned scientific. Granted, our thought process began this way of thinking and proving this theory and that in itself would be a god driven theory in using Berkley’s theory. Look at the scale that sits in the doctor’s office. The knowledge to make the scale would be in conjunction with Berkley’s theory but for the scale to remain stationary due to gravity is outside his realm of thought as once again, God did not create gravity, therefore God cannot be behind everything that happens which, in the end once again, lends credence to pure perception. It is a fine line between these philosophers on what they agree and don’t agree with but in the end there are similarities in which makes them all correct in the way of validation so with this in mind, are they all thinking the same thing yet with different answers and does this make them all correct or incorrect because of their different answers? Which do you believe and why? Maybe I am the one who is totally wrong and incoherent in my own opinions and beliefs. Maybe I have no concrete evidence or cannot fully understand the power of perception, metaphysical, supernatural or inanimate objects, maybe I believe in it all. Does what I believe in make me right, wrong, indifferent or simply this is my belief? Who is to say that I am right or that I disagree and maybe my way of being right or disagreeing is not accepted. We each have our own philosophies of life and the reasons why and this is what makes great debates and the world go around. So in the end I must say that I do not fully agree with any philosopher to date. I may agree with a portion of their principles and systems of belief but at the same time of incorporating my own reasons of this belief or lack of belief I, in my own self have just become a philosopher like everyone else, it is just the people who will determine the validity of my own views and will form their own philosophies. Philosophy is just that, no one is right and no one is wrong it is simply a belief system of how we work minus any factual sciences or the addition of sciences and religion. As a last thought and question which incorporates all but none of these mentioned philosophers; is there really such a thing as an evil person or are they a person who simply does bad things? In short, I believe to some extent of what these philosophers believe but then again I do not for then I would have to agree with everything they say to fully believe in their philosophy, so am I say they are correct or incorrect? References Evidence for God. Famous Scientists Who Believed in God. (September 2008) http://www. godandscience. org/apologetics/sciencefaith. html Tapken, Cara. The Starlite Cafe 1999 (http://www. thestarlitecafe. com/poems/105/poem_91080479. html Theories of perception. September 2008. http://www. unc. edu/~megw/TheoriesofPerception. html How to cite Is What You See Real or Memorex?, Papers